Myth - My Opinion on archetypal criticism

Myth - My Opinion on archetypal criticism

080740330蒋昕恒

Myth Heat is a long history of mythology product. Direct criticism of the 20th century, the source of the myth, I thought it was Nietzsche. He said: \"Every culture myth as long as it has lost, then he also will lose their natural and healthy creativity. Only one surrounded by the myth of a unified vision to their culture.\" \"There is no myth to be opening up the Bunsen The work of art to imagine it will misbehave \"

Myth criticism has gone through three stages of development. The first stage is accompanied by the development of anthropology, the rise of the Cambridge school ceremony. School identified the ceremony, the ceremony first, and myths are generated to explain the ceremony. Implicit in the Greek tragedy in the form of the ceremony. Myth and ritual ceremony to send the link for the myth of the 19th century as a merely symbolic nature of the performance of Mythology, it is an important breakthrough. Its essence is the myth and the social lives of our ancestors as a whole. Primitive ritual studies, not only for understanding the myths, but also for understanding the medieval legend that the Greek culture and the Elizabethan drama, has a role, therefore, the rise of the Cambridge school, from the academic history that is a step forward. The progress of the ceremony of law is that it provides a new perspective, can be ancient and the present, religion, philosophy, literature, art, and many other social sciences to communicate them in a certain sense, which makes the coverage of a broad field possible. However, the myth is too limited to be within the framework of the ceremony, and will be

regarded as all myths are simply the product of the ceremony to not only see the richness of the myth is too narrow, and the myth of the origin and too simplistic, and it also bound to be difficult to explain the ancient rituals and myths of all nationalities between the present state of the various complex. It is limited in theory to make it in the encounter difficulties, seek the help of other theories to support this ritual law they have to go to for their own breakthrough. The use of broad and narrow set theory, it is the performance of the ceremony had been sent out when the rise of internal contradictions.

Research methods of Greece beyond the scope of the study, into the vast field, this is a myth criticism of the second phase of development. Lecture by Murray in 1914: \"Hamlet and Orestes\applied to the ceremony, epic, drama, folk tales, dance, history and other fields as well as taboo. At this stage, on one hand not only the myth of a vast area has been covered, but also high up above the monarchs of the whole of the social sciences; the other hand, the myth of the course of its inflation, but also presents a number of kinds of theoretical orientation, most important of which is the religion and psychology of these two trends. Ritual theory, still the most influential.

Early Nietzsche, through the exploration of the causes for the tragedy, he has been in the category of mythology, related to the psychological problems. The original symbol of his suffering Dionysus, a desire and stimulate feelings and harsh, as if a giant wave of God or spiritual force like barbarians, and to form a symbol of Apollo, standard, clear, self-restraint. Both Dionysus and Apollo, the struggle between both element quality, but also complement each other.

Nietzsche attaches great importance to dreams, he will be the secret of the creation of poetry, go for the dream of the gift. Apollo not only the looks, the highest divergence of Yiyue manner, wisdom and the \"dream\" in America, but also in the intoxication of Dionysus, people in a dreamlike state, after the dissolution of self, but with a species complete the \"only\" integrated nature of the universe. Nietzsche thought that Homer's innocence must be the dream of a complete victory of Apollo to look natural dream of this kind often used to complete its mysterious purpose. Homer to Nietzsche and then said the dreams of a nation and its analytical by nature. Can be said that Nietzsche's concept of literature but a dream of Literature. Literature of this dream, Freud is not only the creation of daydreaming of the first source is the original image of Jung dream embodied by the theory of individual The Origin. Nietzsche also stressed that from the perspective of the state of life dream role. Nietzsche's dream of life on the discussion of the meaning, no doubt a direct revelation of the spirit of the doctrine: its desire to meet that dream is concerned, has laid the basis for Freud's dream theory; to its only for the original The begging for, then they opened the Jung Doctrine.M

For Nietzsche, Jung of Literature, there are two things clear: First, a symbol of his recognition for the second is negative for the individual.

Nietzsche died in 1900, the same year Freud's \"Interpretation of Dreams\" come out of such accident on the year of overlap, but it is symbolic demonstration of Freud and the realization of the objective succession of Nietzsche back to the pre-Socratic times, hoping that is the liberation of the wild. Despite the limitations

of self and the superego role, but the \"I\" or the strength of its pretty wild in the Western intellectual open to a flood, and have become a kind of human animal suffering from neurosis. Western philosophy toward the study represented the academic transformation of their own, thanks to a form of psychology, which appear more \"scientific\" and more reality.